Armchair Analyst: What we've learned from Opta

New stats shed light on conventional wisdom throughout MLS

A friend of mine is engaged to a mathematician, a lovely girl who’s pursuing a doctorate in number-crunching.

Over
lunch on Thursday afternoon, I brought up the partnership MLS has with
Opta, the rise of soccermetrics and some of the stats we’ve put together
through the season’s first several weeks.

Rather than react with
glee, she spent the rest of the day trying to convince me that 28 games
isn’t a large enough sample-size to determine any statistical trends
with an appropriate level of authority, that the margin of error would
be enormous, and doing something as simple and commonplace as running a
binary logistical regression on the data would prove almost worthless.

Luckily
for all of you, I don’t know what a binary logistical regression is,
and the threat of a gigantic margin of error has never stopped me from
speaking out of turn.

Let’s dive into the numbers.

So
far there have been 28 games in this MLS season. The home team is
12-6-10 in those games. Nineteen of the 28 games have had at least one
first-half goal, and 27 of the 28 games have had at least one goal (the
only scoreless draw of the season came when the Red Bulls played at
Columbus in Week 2).

And while there have been a number of pretty
remarkable comebacks already, the team that scores first is still
undefeated at 18-0-9.

What the Opta numbers reveal should be
interesting – but please, keep my mathematician friend’s warning in
mind. These numbers are fun to look at and play with, but the sample
size is woefully small and the predictive value from a mathematics
standpoint is minimal.

“Possession” is the first and most basic soccermetric.

If
you’ve been watching European or certain international games over the
past 10 years, you’ve doubtless seen possession stats flashed across the
screen at some point. Over the past three years, as Barcelona have
raised the possession game to an art form, “The Cult of the Pass” has
blossomed. (Full disclosure: I’m a card-carrying member.)

But how
does possession translate for teams that don’t boast the three best
players in the world and an academy that’s been simmering to perfection
for 40 years?

The answer so far, is “not that well.” Teams holding
more possession through the season’s first 28 games have won just 25
percent of the time, clocking in at 7-11-10 overall. The team with the
best possession numbers are the Red Bulls, who absolutely dominated in
their two home games and did a decent job with a makeshift lineup at
Columbus as well. True to form, New York are 1-1-1.

The Red Bulls,
like many other teams throughout the world, have had trouble converting
that dominance on the ball into goals. They’ve scored just twice in
their three games, with neither goal coming off a sustained build-up.

While
the Red Bulls are purpose-built to hold the ball, in many other
instances it seems that scoreline-specific tactics influence the stats.
That’s a fancy way of saying, “If you don’t score first, you’re
finished.”

Conventional wisdom says that in
MLS, the team that gets on the board first tends to sit back afterward
and invite attacks, which in turn gives them more chances to
counterattack. The numbers thus far back up that assertion as the team
that’s been first to score has won the possession battle in just nine of
the 27 games where the goal has been breached.

Another bit of
conventional wisdom is that home teams chase the win, while road teams
chase the result. This turns out to be another bit of axiomatic thinking
that’s backed up by Opta’s numbers.

In the 20 times this season
that the home team has entered halftime either trailing or tied, 15 of
those games ended with the home side winning the possession battle. The
numbers make it clear that “chasing the win” means getting on the ball
and launching attacks as often as possible, while “chasing the result”
means sitting back and protecting the 0-0 or 0-1 score line while
hitting on the counter.

In the other eight games, the ones where
the home team led at the half, the numbers are almost reversed. Home
teams have won the possession battle under those circumstances just
thrice, or 37.5 percent of the time. That’s exactly half as frequently
as they win the possession battle when tied or trailing at the break.

Does this mean Sigi Schmid was correct when he called MLS “a counterattack league” in March? As with everything else, it's too early to tell.

But
so far, nobody’s been more guilty of playing by the rule of the counter
than the Sounders. In their two home games (both of which saw Seattle
tied or trailing at the half), they out-possessed, out-passed and
outshot their opponent.

In their two road games (one in which they
were protecting a lead, the other protecting a draw), the numbers say
the Sounders bunkered for their lives. They allowed 541 passes and 63
percent possession to the Red Bulls in what was eventually a 1-0 loss in
Week 1, and 453 passes and 58 percent possession to the San Jose
Earthquakes (a much more direct team than RBNY) in what became a 2-2
draw last weekend.

That 1-0 New York win over Seattle last month,
by the way, is one of just five games in which a team has attempted more
than 500 passes and won. The Red Bulls had a league-high 545 passes and
the LA Galaxy 538 in 1-1 draws against Houston and New England,
respectively. Vancouver allowed 509 passes in countering Toronto to
death, 4-2, in Week 1. And the Rapids gave up 540 passes to Chivas USA
in a clinical 1-0 Week 2 triumph.

Yes, that shows bunkering really
can work, and often does. What’ll be interesting, though, is a revisit
of those numbers in a few months when offenses have shaken off their
early-season rust. My hunch is that things will even out as the season
goes on.

And if I’m wrong, we’ll have the stats to prove it.

Matthew Doyle can be reached for comment at matdoyle76@gmail.com and followed on Twitter at @MLS_Analyst.

<p><em><a href="http://www.mlssoccer.com/extratime"
target="_blank"><img
src="http://www.mlssoccer.com/sites/default/files/new-etr-banner.jpg"
alt="" width="620" height="100" /></a><br
/></em></p>